Tuesday, March 21, 2006

White Trash Palace

This morning's goodie...
White Trash Palace. Gitcher kitchy stuff hyere.

Even if you're Catholic there's something for you. Or maybe I should say especially if you're Catholic. The hostess of this treasure trove is apparently Catholic, so she has a special place in her heart for trashy Catholic tastes.

White Trash Gift - Nunzilla -- Nunzilla is 2” tall and made of hard plastic with an intimidating expression. Wind her up and she trudges like a determined disciplinary force, shooting sparks from her mouth. Only five bucks.

Our Lady of Guadalupe Shirt -- This is a "WTP" designed tee featuring Our Lady of Guadalupe, the Patron Saint of the Americas. Believe it our not, the Queens of the WTP are in fact Catholic, so we adore Our Lady and all stuff associated. Of course, now a great deal of the Catholic culture is now quite in fashion----but we were Catholic BEFORE it was cool. Twenty-two bucks.

Find out how WT you are.
It's SPRINGTIME at your trailerpark. What kind of tasks do you take on to get your trailer (or house) ready for Spring? Your answers will give an indication of just how WT you are!

Don't get the wrong idea. This is not a site for Catholics only. There is plenty of stuff for everyone else, infidels included. Whenever we come across a corresponding internet business peddling Muslim and Bedouin Trash I will know that world peace is just around the corner. From what I gather they are already on the way genetically in much the same way that WT in America has flourished, Pedigree Collapse.

Bedouins do not carry more genetic mutations than the general population. But because so many marry relatives — some 65 percent of Bedouin in Israel's Negev marry first or second cousins — they have a significantly higher chance of marrying someone who carries the same mutations, increasing the odds they will have children with genetic diseases, researchers say. Hundreds have been born with such diseases among the Negev Bedouin in the last decade.

The plight of the community is being addressed by an unusual scientific team: Dr. Ohad Birk, a Jewish Israeli geneticist, and two physicians, Dr. Izzeldin Abuelaish, a Palestinian from the Gaza Strip, and Dr. Khalil Elbedour, himself a Bedouin from Israel.

They work together in the southern Israeli city of Beersheba at a genetics center with two neighboring branches, the Genetics Institute of Soroka Medical Center and the Morris Kahn Human Molecular Genetics Lab at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev.

* * * *
Credits: Thanks for this morning's little post go to NY Times..., Diana Moon..., Henry Copeland, and especially Michelle Lamar who helped put it all together in my mind.

Later: Found out the Washington Post also took a look. But they didn't make the same connection I did, expecting Sandmonkey Trash to be next...
As I said, when we see that we will know that world peace is at hand.

Monday, March 20, 2006

BREAKING -- BELARUS IN THE STREETS

Publius is following closely.

Pictures here.

If you're not following these events whenever you get close to a keyboard, you're missing the latest excitement on the internet. By and large it is being glossied over by popular media and lost in the shuffle of co-called local news.

Yahoo is doing its part.

Neeka's backlog Tuesday, March 21, 2006
.
br23 blog
reports hundreds of riot police units stationed in the backyards of the buildings adjacent to Oktyabrskaya Sq. The protesters, however, are determined to stay "until the new election date is set, in July." LJ user samuel_smith writes (RUS) that cars with drinking water and food for the protesters are kept from parking at the square by the police. LJ user agafon_bel writes (RUS) that Aleksandr Milinkevich's two sons were detained by police and almost charged with petty hooliganism, but when the police colonel learned who they were, he not just let them go but gave them a ride to the square.

Charter 97 is posting something every few minutes...

00:3000:50, 21/03/2006
Policemen do not allow the cars bringing food and mineral water to stop on the square. A policeman in mufti seized a bag with warm things and blankets from the hands of a person who went to the square.

00:2500:49, 21/03/2006
Traffic policemen have detained a car with activists of Alyaksandr Kazulin. They were transporting the Bell of Freedom. The car was stopped and taken to the police department of Central district.

00:2000:49, 21/03/2006
Several thousand people remain standing on the square. About 20 tents are placed there. People are singing songs and playing guitars. National flags, flags of the European Union and Zubr are seen. People are chanting: “Long live Belarus!”, “Police is with the people!” There are several dozens of policemen in mufti on the square. They are serenely observing the scene and do not make a move.

Alyaksandr Milinkevich’s sons are released00:16, 21/03/2006
The candidate of the democratic forces has informed about that himself. Alyaksandr and Vitaut called on the phone and said that they had been detained by policemen, but now they are released and are going to arrive to the square.

23:5000:13, 21/03/2006
Alyaksandr Milinkevich and his wife have come to the tent camp fixed on the square. Now there are 15 tents on the square. The leader of the democratic forces shook by the hand each of the protesters and thanked them for their courage. People are scanning: “Milinkevich!”, “Long live Belarus!”

Opinion survey -- Reason on Line

As the third anniversary of the invasion of Iraq approaches, Reason asked a wide range of libertarian, conservative, and freedom-minded journalists and academics to assess the war, the occupation, and how their views have or have not changed.

This summary is worth a look. Results are all over the place.
This one, by Tim Cavanaugh, Reason's web editor, scares the hell out of me but I can't think of any compelling arguments against it except, as he says, it might offend our sense of decency. A sense of decency, it seems, is no longer on the list of desireable qualities to be called civilized.

Let the Shiite Crescent bloom: We've already spent thousands of lives and half a trillion dollars inadvertently nurturing it, so we might at least get the incremental benefit of having a deadly rival to the Salafists who are even more determined than the Shiites to destroy our civilization. (Just so, we should have let the Iranians finish kicking Saddam's ass in the 1980s.) That means accepting the current Mullahfied Iraqi government and leaving it to brutalize the Sunnis at will. This might offend our sense of decency, but if we stay in the country, the same historical forces that drove the British, the Turks, and all other visitors to back the Sunnis over the Shiites will drive us down the same road.

Belarus -- Today's most exciting story

Publius is live-blogging another revolution in the streets.
This is blogging at it's best. Babes, too! That tells me this is for real.

Veronica Khokhlova is working overtime liveblogging this as well. She translates a post from LiveJournal user lipski that says people are beginning to go home because it’s cold and can’t hear what people are saying very well. He says that people are a bit disappointed due to the snow storm, but in general are happy to see the strength they have in numbers and the overwhelming support they’ve gotten. But Neeka, who lived through the Orange Revolution herself, notes that the first night of protests weren’t exactly anything to gawk at either and people had the same sinking feeling in their stomachs. And yet the next morning, just as Milinkevich called people out now for tomorrow, people showed up and began their revolution. Now we must wait and see if the people of Belarus can reignite the fire in them come morning, and if the military won’t kill them. That the election commission plans on giving Lukashenko some 90% of the vote, when independent exit polls put him at 47% — thus forcing a runoff with Milinkevich — should be enough to get people out on the streets. At least I hope so.

Rumsfeld on Iraq

On this third anniversary of the US occupation of Iraq read the words of a true bveliever, the Secretary of Defence.

Though there are those who will never be convinced that the cause in Iraq is worth the costs, anyone looking realistically at the world today -- at the terrorist threat we face -- can come to only one conclusion: Now is the time for resolve, not retreat.

Consider that if we retreat now, there is every reason to believe Saddamists and terrorists will fill the vacuum -- and the free world might not have the will to face them again. Turning our backs on postwar Iraq today would be the modern equivalent of handing postwar Germany back to the Nazis. It would be as great a disgrace as if we had asked the liberated nations of Eastern Europe to return to Soviet domination because it was too hard or too tough or we didn't have the patience to work with them as they built free countries.

The whole statement is in the Washington Post and elsewhere, I'm sure. I was self-conscious about using the term occupation until I read the word postwar. One is as applicable as the other. And both will apply after the fact, regardless of the outcome.

And the outcome hangs precariously in the balance.

Mixed signals

You know what they say about backsides...

Compare this post with this column.

What's that saying? ...you can't make this stuff up.

Those who advocate democratic expression in places now run by kings, sheiks, tribal leaders and clerics should reflect long and hard on this post and this column. Be careful what you ask for, because you may very well receive it, along with unintended results. Take a good look at how Missouri legislators are dealing with abortion and birth control and ask yourself: Would a tradition-based population from the KSA or UAE behave any differently?

As I recall, Afghanistan was/is the poster child for how much better conditions are in the wake of an enlightened US involvement in their internal affairs. I don't find this story very encouraging.

An Afghan man who recently admitted he converted to Christianity faces the death penalty under the country's strict Islamic legal system. The trial is a critical test of Afghanistan's new constitution and democratic government.

The case is attracting widespread attention in Afghanistan, where local media are closely monitoring the landmark proceedings.

Michelle Malkin noticed, too.

Sunday, March 19, 2006

From another front: Gaza

Late-night surfing brings this... Not a pretty picture, I'm afraid.

Well blog readers, we are out of Gaza and no one knows when we will be going back in. There has been a mass exodus of westerners out of the Strip because of what has happened. Along with the mass kidnappings, an armed force of terrorists attacked the school.

We had word early on Tuesday (March 14th) that there might be a problem due to the Israeli capture of the six Palestinian militants from the jail in Jericho, so it was decided that school would be turned out early. We had the kids out for the buses, but two of the buses were late so about half of the kids were still sitting on the edge of the soccer field waiting. I heard shots being fired just as one of the Israeli drones went overhead, so I thought that someone was just shooting at the drone, but then I saw the security at the top of the hill running toward the shots. Then the shots started going overhead and we started to herd the children back to the building. As I ran to the building, I saw someone with his arm around one of the teachers; I mistook him for one of the security forces people until I was about 15 yards from him. He was holding the teacher hostage while the real security was advancing on him. I took the kids that were with me and got behind something for cover.

About that time, one of the other teachers started yelling for the kids and I to pull back behind the generator shed about 60 yards or so behind us, so with gunfire still going off, another teacher and I pulled the kids back behind the building. Almost immediately, one of the security guys and one of the Palestinian teachers ran out to us screaming for us (the two western teachers) to come with them to safety. I told them to take Stephen since I would not be automatically picked out as westerner and I was the only one left with the kids. But they came right back after they got him in the building and were ordering me to come with them. When I refused, the older high school boys started yelling at me to get to safety and that they would take care of the younger children. So the security guys and I made the sprint for the building through middle of the fight. Unknown to us, about 10 of the militants had gotten into the building, so we spent the first few minutes hiding in the building, a few teachers with students in rooms spread all over the school, waiting for the security forces to retake the building.

When the militants started to leave, they grabbed two of the other teachers (two Australians that they thought were Americans). When two of the Palestinian staff tried to prevent them from leaving with the teachers, the militants shot them. It took about 20 minutes for the security forces to retake the building. During that time, the American Consulate in Jerusalem was on the phone to me every few minutes getting updates. They immediately liaised with the Palestinian Authority to get the four Americans out as soon as possible, but by the time they were ready to go, ALL of the western teachers were ready to be taken out (with all of the foreign embassies getting their people out).

We were taken out the back way to avoid the militants who were trying to cut off the route to the Erez Crossing. Even when we got there, things did not calm down. The UN contingent was just behind us and were stopped before they got to the crossing and had to be freed by the security forces. We crossed over to wait on the release of the two kidnapped teachers. As soon as they were through the crossing, the Israelis immediately started to pound the hell out of Gaza.

The upshot is, there has been a mass exodus of westerners out of Gaza. Even western women who are married to Palestinians are no longer safe. The militants even tried to kidnap a woman who has been living in Gaza 15 years and is married with kids. Even she is not safe there now.

I don't know what this will mean for the school next year, but at the moment we're about to meet to talk about what’s going to happen next. I will keep you posted.

Bird Flu Watch

"...the World Health Organisation has thus far confirmed only 173 cases of avian flu in humans, but more than half of those people died. And the virus has been spreading rapidly westwards from East Asia as far as Western Europe. A small genetic mutation could greatly facilitate its transmission from birds to humans and between humans. "

From a Niall Ferguson column in the London Telegraph.

Also, H5N1 Blog points to an excellent online world map in the WaPo showing the spread of bird flu, tracking the last three years.

NPR's All Things Considered had a three and a half minute segment last Thursday discussing the bio-physics involved with a dreaded mutation of the virus from its current B2B and B2H form into a H2H pandemic model. (Bird to Bird, Bird to Human, Human to Human...)

As in the case of hurricanes, there is a smug, pregnant silence in Washington. No one seems to tire of waving the bloody shirt when it comes to rattling sabers at Muslims, advocating vigilante behavior on our Southern border or spending breathtaking amounts of earmarked pork from the Treasury. One would think that the specter of a global flu epidemic presents a much more rational and productive motivation for nations to seek cooperation over conflict, but that thinking seems to be politically unfeasible.

In the past, preparations for epidemics that never materialized (think Swine Flu) resulted in negative political fallout for those who were later smeared with the "over-reaction" epithet. So much for being better-safe-than-sorry. Seems to me the only real way to win with preparations for a pandemic is to lose and lose big. That would be cause for a great sigh of relief. Unfortunately too few people would agree.

Great comment here from Meryl Yourish...

China received global condemnation for dragging its two point six billion feet in reporting cases and sharing information on epidemics last year, failing to contain the virus and allowing it to spread into other countries.

Will Egypt receive condemnation for failing to contain the virus and take an active role in controlling it?

Go ahead. Hold your breath. The blue will go nicely with the upholstery.

"Boomer-bashing has become a virtual cottage industry."

This essay by Leonard Steinhorn was in the Washington Post a month ago and I missed it. Snave grabbed it, so here it is for my scrapbook. It's just short of a rant, but ir's really not carping. His points are well-taken. As the sub-title says, who contributed more -- the heroes of World War II or the revelers at Woodstock?

It makes the headlines nearly every day, and the tone is usually resentful: Beware of those soon-to-retire baby boomers, all 80 million of them, who are about to place a huge burden on the rest of us. The first of this whiny, entitled generation are turning 60 this year, and they'll be demanding even more special treatment in old age than they've gotten the rest of their lives.
But imagine if the generation getting ready to retire wasn't the baby boomers, but the World War II generation -- or the Greatest Generation, as it's popularly lionized. No one would be calling those Americans a burden or a drag. If they were retiring today, we'd be writing columns full of praise for their sacrifice and discussing what our nation owes them and how it's our moral duty to support them.

Why the different attitudes toward these two generations? Why is one idealized as heroic and giving, while the other is disdained as self-indulgent and taking? It's time to reassess. The true test of a generation should be what it's done to make America better. And in that regard, boomers have an important story to tell. It's a story about a more inclusive and tolerant America, about women's equality and men's growing respect for it, about an appreciation for cultural diversity too long denied, about a society that no longer turns a blind eye to prejudice or pollution.

The boomers' problem is not that they haven't accomplished a great deal; it's that we take their accomplishments for granted and don't give them any credit. But if we look more closely at the legacies of both the boomers and their parents, we might see that the boomers are a far more consequential group than many admit. We might see, in fact, that they have advanced American values in ways the Greatest Generation refused to do.

Today, no one questions what the World War II generation gave to America, and that's as it should be. Its members sacrificed their lives and futures to defend our country. They were heroes then, and they deserve our continuing gratitude. But the reality few acknowledge is that, mission accomplished, they returned home to preside, by and large without complaint, over an American society vastly inferior to the one we know today.

Our view of the 1950s is clouded by nostalgia. We have a Norman Rockwell image of that era, one of tightknit neighborhoods and white picket fences. But for too many Americans, this was no golden age. In the storied years of the 1950s, we told women to stay home, blacks to stay separate, gays to stay closeted, Jews to stay inconspicuous, and those who didn't conform or prayed to a different God to feel ashamed and stay silent.

Greatest Generation blacks who fought Hitler were forced to sit behind German POWs at USO concerts, and when they returned home the new suburban neighborhoods -- emblems of the American Dream -- were closed to them. Even baseball great Willie Mays couldn't find a house to buy when the Giants moved from New York to San Francisco in 1957 -- until the mayor intervened. Just as Jews anglicized names and decorated Christmas trees to fit in, blacks tried to straighten their hair and bleach their skin by using fiery, painful chemical products with names such as Black-No-More. For them there was nothing warm or nurturing about that era.

It was a time when men with beards seemed subversive and women in pants were questioned by police, and when the Organization Man ruled the workplace. Children thought to be gay were sent off for psychiatric treatment and even electroshock therapy. As for those who spoke up for the environment, they were irritants in a nation that was on the march and viewed smog alerts and clouds of soot as simply the price of progress.

Women of that era found themselves trapped in an apron. Want ads were segregated by sex -- a practice The Washington Post didn't end until 1971 -- and it wasn't unusual for a description of the perfect "girl" to be "5-foot-5 to 5-foot-7 in heels." Judges ridiculed female attorneys as "lawyerettes" in court. A woman's job didn't count for much, as credit bureaus typically denied women their economic independence.

The Greatest Generation largely accepted and defended this status quo. Even in the 1990s, polls showed Greatest Generation majorities continuing to resist racial intermarriage, working mothers and laws to protect gays from discrimination. Through the late 1980s, a majority of white respondents in national polls even said they would vote for a law allowing a homeowner to refuse to sell his home to a black buyer.

In other words, if most Greatest Generation Americans had their way, American life would have remained frozen in the '50s. They were not the agents of change that built the far more inclusive, tolerant, free and equal America we have today.

That task fell to the boomers, who almost immediately started breaking down the restrictive codes and repressive convictions of the Greatest Generation's era. From the moment pollsters began recording their attitudes in the 1960s, boomers stood diametrically opposed to their elders on the core issues of race, women, religious pluralism, homosexuality and environmental protection. They saw an America that was not living up to its ideals, and they set about to change it.

But this is a story that rarely gets told. In part that's because the media prefer the dramatic or the epic, which leaves out a great deal of social change. In part it's because we remain fixated on the '60s, as if boomer history ended there. Yet nearly four decades have passed since the '60s ended, and the ways in which America has changed are so far-reaching and fundamental that they have transformed how we live as profoundly as any war or New Deal.

Today, we see minorities and women contributing to society in ways that would have been unimaginable just a few decades ago. Diversity and pluralism are now moral values, bigotry and sexual harassment no longer get a free pass, and ethnic boundaries once considered impermeable are breaking down in media, society and personal relationships. Half of all teens now report dating across racial and ethnic lines -- and 90 percent say their parents have no problem with it.

Discrimination against gays? Increasingly prohibited. Domestic partner benefits? Increasingly accepted. Men sharing housework and child care duties? No more raised eyebrows. Toxic runoffs and belching smokestacks? No longer tolerated. The command and control workplace? On its way out.

So natural and comfortable are these new norms that most of us take them for granted, as if it's always been this way. Because we live in a changed America, we tend to forget what it was like before boomers agitated for change.

Boomer-bashing has become a virtual cottage industry. They're labeled "the worst generation." They're accused of infantilism and self-promotion. One Web site described them as "a plague of self-centered locusts."

Part of what drives this vitriol is an implied criticism that boomers are soft and overindulged because they never sacrificed in a Great War or Depression. But millions of boomers fought bravely in a war their parents handed them, and millions more risked arrest, uncertainty and ostracism for protesting what they believed to be the pointlessness and duplicity of that war. There's no reason to believe that boomers wouldn't have fought Hitler as nobly as their parents did, and boomer antiwar protesters said as much at the time, distinguishing between what they saw as the just and necessary war against fascism and the misguided, deceptive and morally ambiguous war in Vietnam.

As for the well-worn condemnation of boomer materialism, the truth is that materialism is nothing new in America, and boomers are far from the first and only generation to face this charge: It was conspicuous consumption in the 1920s and keeping up with the Joneses in the '50s.

Boomers certainly haven't solved all of society's problems, and they've created a few as well. But if we held the World War II generation to the same standard, the word "greatest" would never come to mind. Even if we're not a perfect America today, in so many ways we're a better America. And for that, we owe the baby boomers our thanks.

Saturday, March 18, 2006

Kidneys and other body parts

For some reason I'm coming across a lot more body-parts stories than usual the last day or two. Maybe they have always been there and I only just noticed because I'm having a bout with what the eye doctor calls corneal dystrophy in my left eye, but I don't think so. Lookit this...

Virginia Postrel writes that this is National Kidney Month.

Two posts earlier she linkd to a story about how kidney donations can be on the rise thanks to an innovative program at Massachusetts General Hospital that enables friends of kidney patients needing a new organ to donate their otherwise incompatible organs to a different patient in need in a quid pro quo arrangement resulting in compatible organs for two.

But last week, Borchert saved her friend's life by giving a kidney to Krafton, a man she did not know, in the first test of a system that brings together strangers to exchange organs for transplant. At the same moment that surgeons at Massachusetts General Hospital began removing Borchert's kidney for Krafton, another surgical team at New York Presbyterian Hospital started taking a kidney from Krafton's friend, Steve Proulx, to implant in Borchert's friend, who asked to remain anonymous.

Virginia Postrel knows whereof she speaks because she is a donor herself. There is an interesting political spin in a great story by Amity Shlaes.

Okay, then.
Just a while ago I came across another kidney story at BoingBoing. The link and story is about a South Korean muscal being produced by someone who left North Korea. It's an interesting story, but the part that stuck in my head was this little blurb...

Oh, and the director, he had to put up his kidney as collateral to put the show on. If he can pay them back by next month, it won't be removed.

Kidney for collateral? Imagine that. Something seems not quite right about that. It recalls Shylock's pound of flesh from The Merchant of Venice.

But college coeds are raising money by selling their eggs.

At least one guy was so angry about something he cut off his own penis and threw it at the cops. Gives a whole new meaning to the phrase pissed off, doesn't it?

And finally, also via BoingBoing, a just-published book about the cadaver business, Body Brokers.

I don't think it is my imagination. There really seems to be a rash of stories about body parts and such. Hey, I even know personally a young woman who just went through the egg-donation procedure. And when I asked the eye doctor about a prosthetic cornea (I knew that cataract surgery routinely implants a factory-made lens that enables the patient to see better than they did before surgery) he replied that there was no need. It seems cornea transplants have such a high success rate that there is no demand for factory-make products.

Is it any wonder that Aubrey de Grey believes the next generation might live to 150 years, and the first human to reach the age of 1000 might already be born?

Living indefinitely, or at least hundreds of years, is not an outrageous scientific proposition, said Cambridge University scientist Aubrey de Grey.

Achieving what he called "life-span escape velocity" by always staying a couple of decades ahead of death is theoretically possible, although probably not for another half century.

For those of us in the retirement living/ gerontology setting that is what I call real job security.

Riverbend Essay

Already I know just seeing the name "Riverbend" will lose many readers. To many, she has been the gold standard for Iraqi anti-American sentiment. Too bad so many have made that pre-judgement because she is highly-regarded in a lot of circles, and her essay this morning rings absolutely true to me. Reflecting on the last three years in Iraq, she goes to a core issue, the poisonous divide the press is calling "sectarian," a separation of Sunni and Shiite Moslems that before the war was, from all I have read, minimal to non-existent in most of Iraq.

This is not to say there was no differnce. There clearly was a divide with a mathematical advantage to Shias. And there was also a political unevenness in Saddam's manipulative tactic of allowing a Sunni minority to subjigate a Shiite majority. But those differences seem to have been more tribal or social than sectarian, an accident of political alliances which furnished a convenient template for a political imbalance. Such arrangements are nothing new in the history of totalitarian regimes. Think South Africa, the former Yugoslavia, Romania, Hitler's Germany. Playing one group off against another is a tactic in every tyrant's toolbox, typically with a minority group (seeking power, and offering loyalty to the dictator in return for the acquisition of that power) receiving military, technical, economic and police resources to keep the majority under tight control. It is a win-win arangement between a minority group and the tyrant whereby a numerical majority is kept under control.

With a tyrannical infrastructure no longer in play, the fires of a backlash are in play, with every report fanning the flames. One would hope that as an outside force seeking peace the US might become an agent of reconciliation, but thanks to the need for hegemony official policy is aimed more at allignment with whatever forces emerge dominant from the chaos. And all the talk about "democracy" points to the dominance of the mathemaical majority, which in this case happens to be Shiite. On the face of it, the notion is appealing. But at another level it is nothing more than an inverted version of a totalitarian state, with a tyranny of the minority being replaced by a tyranny of the majority, that worst possible enemy of democracy itself.

With those thoughts in mind, go read the Riverbend essay.

I read constantly analyses mostly written by foreigners or Iraqis who’ve been abroad for decades talking about how there was always a divide between Sunnis and Shia in Iraq (which, ironically, only becomes apparent when you're not actually living amongst Iraqis they claim)… but how under a dictator, nobody saw it or nobody wanted to see it. That is simply not true- if there was a divide, it was between the fanatics on both ends. The extreme Shia and extreme Sunnis. Most people simply didn’t go around making friends or socializing with neighbors based on their sect. People didn't care- you could ask that question, but everyone would look at you like you were silly and rude.

I remember as a child, during a visit, I was playing outside with one of the neighbors children. Amal was exactly my age- we were even born in the same month, only three days apart. We were laughing at a silly joke and suddenly she turned and asked coyly, “Are you Sanafir or Shanakil?” I stood there, puzzled. ‘Sanafir’ is the Arabic word for “Smurfs” and ‘Shanakil” is the Arabic word for “Snorks”. I didn’t understand why she was asking me if I was a Smurf or a Snork. Apparently, it was an indirect way to ask whether I was Sunni (Sanafir) or Shia (Shanakil).

“What???” I asked, half smiling. She laughed and asked me whether I prayed with my hands to my sides or folded against my stomach. I shrugged, not very interested and a little bit ashamed to admit that I still didn’t really know how to pray properly, at the tender age of 10.

Later that evening, I sat at my aunt’s house and remember to ask my mother whether we were Smurfs or Snorks. She gave me the same blank look I had given Amal. “Mama- do we pray like THIS or like THIS?!” I got up and did both prayer positions. My mother’s eyes cleared and she shook her head and rolled her eyes at my aunt, “Why are you asking? Who wants to know?” I explained how Amal, our Shanakil neighbor, had asked me earlier that day. “Well tell Amal we’re not Shanakil and we’re not Sanafir- we’re Muslims- there’s no difference.”

It was years later before I learned that half the family were Sanafir, and the other half were Shanakil, but nobody cared. We didn’t sit around during family reunions or family dinners and argue Sunni Islam or Shia Islam. The family didn’t care about how this cousin prayed with his hands at his side and that one prayed with her hands folded across her stomach. Many Iraqis of my generation have that attitude. We were brought up to believe that people who discriminated in any way- positively or negatively- based on sect or ethnicity were backward, uneducated and uncivilized.

Friday, March 17, 2006

St. Patrick's Day

Jake wishes everyone a festive St. Patrick's Day celebration! Here is an Irish joke for the occasion.
**
****
******
****
**
Paddy was driving down the street in a sweat because he had an important meeting and couldn't find a parking space.

Looking up to heaven he said, "Lord, take pity on me. If you find me a parking place I will go to Mass every Sunday for the rest of my life and give up drinking Irish Whiskey."

Just then a parking space miraculously appeared. Paddy looked up and said, "Never mind, Lord. I found one."

Thursday, March 16, 2006

Serial Rape -- Congress on Social Security

For years the revenue collected from employers and workers as a payroll tax to suppoort Social Security ( not subject to any deductions, by the way) has exceded the needs of Social Security. That's right. There has been a surplus collected every year for many years.

And every year that "surplus" has been treated as ordinary income to the Treasury and spent. It has not been accumulating for future Social Security needs. When the president says the system will be "bankrupt" in a few years, what that means is that expenses will excede income. Since past excess collections will have been spent, the term "bankrupt" is fairly apt. Very much the same way that if I choose to spend all that I earn and set nothing aside for future needs I will become bankrupt when those needs come due.

Once again, the Senate has voted to continue pissing away that overage.

Trump takedown

First, read this...

“It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than open one's mouth and remove all doubt.”

Now read Grant McCracken.

Just when we were beginning to think that Mr. Trump might not be a "short fingered vulgarian," he stages a show that removes all doubt.

Uh, so far no arguments in the comments thread. I'm sure not gonna disagree.

Looking at historical Muslim contributions

Younghusband at Coming Anarchy links to a site enumerating many contributions made over the years to science, medicine, music and other cultural artifacts. It's an interesting place to visit, but among the comments are a couple of pointed observations that take some of the wind out of the sails.

A lot of the inventions attributed to ‘Islam’ (why dont other religions get kudos for inventions?) were actually invented in muslim controlled lands by infidel non muslims.
...
There are some instances of muslim achievement in the sciences, but often Islam intervened to make sure that scientific development was halted. In medicine, muslims were the first to establish pharmacies and require standards of doctors and pharmacists, to be enforced by an examination system. Under the reign of the fifth caliph, Harun al-Rashid (753-809), the first hospital was established in Bagdad, and others followed. But modern medical advances were not made by muslims...because muslims were forbidden to dissect human bodies.
[...]
...I mean to say that far from ‘Islam’ being responsible for scientific discovery, whatever muslims discovered as in spite of having Islam holding them back.

And this:

This site was disappointing in that they took for granted that any invention made by Arabic, Persian, or Turkic people was automatically “Muslim”. For example, I noticed that chess is noted as Muslim, because they came to the west through the “Muslim” world. But even people who attribute chess to the Middle East (though it’s disputed) believe that the game was invented long before Mohammed was a twinkle in his daddy’s eye.
Also, it asserts that Muslims introduced cosmetics to the West ... Call me crazy, but I think that it’s been shown that peoples all over the world, from South America to the sub-continent have been using cosmetics ever since they realized that blackberries turn your lips red.
The list goes on.
Certainly Muslims are not the only people to attribute everything to their own civilization, but this was a real disappointment. I went looking for science and got more bluster.


I was enjoyed looking at the site because I tend to take all claims, Muslim or otherwise, with a grain of salt. This delightful caption was under an illustration.

Rather than eating potatoes and soggy swedes like Medieval Europe, the Islamic world over 800 years ago had a constant supply of fresh foods to eat throughout the whole year.

I recall hearing Harry Golden years ago make a similar remark...

When Europeans were still roaming the forests, painting their bodies green, the Jews already had diabetes.

Wednesday, March 15, 2006

Mamacita and others on education

[Advisory: This post will take a while to ingest. If time is limited, come back later.]

One of my jobs where I now work is dipping ice cream. And one of the flavors is Moose Tracks. Don't ask me why, that name...maybe because moose leave huge lumps of stuff behind as they go tromping through the woods. Or maybe the dairy people, like the people who name real estate developments, just ran out of names one day. I dunno. Anyway, in moose tracks you sometimes dig around in the tub and come across a mother-lode of chocolate all in one piece, a semi-sweet chocolate boulder of chocolate magma than has to be broken a time or two to make room in the dipper for even a little vanilla ice cream. For the average ice cream afficianado it is a nice perq, but for the chocoholic, it is like waking up on Easter to find your basket packed with nothing but chocolate. No marshmallows. No circus peanuts. No jelly bird eggs. Just one chocolate treat after another.

I say all that to introduce three rich wellsprings of rich blogging all in one post. Nothing I write here (as you can see for yourself) will be anything like what they say themselves. They are The Anchoress, Siggy (short for Sigmund, Carl and Alfred), and Mamacita. Think of Siggy as a the most indulgent banana split you have ever been served, Mamacita as a big portion of Moose tracks on the side, and The Anchoress as a tall, frothy cup of gourmet coffee, not too much sugar, with a generous shot of Drambouie added.

These three converge on this occasion to discuss the sorry state of education in America. Since my own baby is pushing thirty and my grandchildren are a generation down the line, separated more by keyboards than books, I don't have personal credentials to speak with authority about what is happening in schools today. I'm sure it is as bad as they say, maybe worse. But I am more alarmed at the whole in loco parentis theme defining what now passes for education in the post-WWII era which has made the two-income family obligatory instead of optional. It is all well and good to say that the mission of shool is to educate, not provide day-care. But that ideal is a distant dream for a lot, maybe a majority, of families. And the poisonous phrase single-parent family is not helping.

My own views on education have already been formed. I am open to whatever ideas might be added as time passes, but I cannot break free of the foundational importance of the family in determining the end result. There are good reasons for officials, authorities, politicians and other putative "leaders" and "role models" to offer guidance about what should and should not be included in a curriculum, but I have no confidence that any certified outline or syllabus can ever substitute for old-fashioned parental encouragement and support. I am careful to avoid using the word "involvement" because it is misleading. Involvement implies that a level of parental accomplishment that is commendable but not essential to the success of the process. How else would illiterate parents ever rear children who develop into physicians or physicists?

Only two days ago I came across a wonderful family treasure: a three-page letter, written in pencil toward the end of the nineteenth century. With two or three erasures and corrections, and a couple of repetitions that reveal that the writer was not accustomed to writing much of anything, it was a sincere written plea to my grandmother from her father to seek the advice of a well-educated Dr. McKee and his daughter regarding what might be the best course of study for her, my grandmother, to pursue in school. She was a college student in Ohio at the time and it was easy to spot her daddy's thinly-veiled concern that her interest in elocution and physical education might not serve her well in finding a "profitable position" when she got out of school. Having lost her mother, his wife, in childbirth, and his fortune by having sold the family estate to someone who paid him off in Confederate money, he was in no position to give his only child, being reared by relatives better able to feed and support her, much more than encouragement to seek the advice of others whom he respected.

Again I am reminded of my own great heritage, not of formal education, but of a family that valued the process of learning. Whatever educational achievement I have I attribute to that heritage more than any institution. And my guess is that most educated people, given enough time, would tell a similar story. Classrooms, instructors and others from academia would be an important part of the story, of course, but in the end there would be role models -- maybe not parents or family -- who became the lynchpins of their success.

Tuesday, March 14, 2006

PejmanYousefzadeh on Dubai

He links to Ann Althouse as well. Dan Drezner, too.

Looks like Congress did enough damage to foreign policy to keep the State Department busy for a long time patching things up abroad.

...the political dinosaurs who all too prominently inhabit the terrain of policymaking when it comes to dealing with the challenges of the global economy and domestic security don't appear to recognize this fact. So instead, they are content to demagogue the issue for short-term political gain (including their own political gain should they eventually decide to run for President) while doing a monumental injustice to the facts and sacrificing the long term economic and security interests of the United States. At some point, one expects that this brand of political antediluvianism will give way to a brand of thinking that is with the times and in tune with the facts. But that does not appear to be ready to happen anytime soon.

Sigh.

John Burgess on Dubai

This is what happens when vox populi gets too loud.
It's okay in the context of democratic principles, but it also reveals how, in Churchill's clever turn of phrase, it is the worst form of government there is, except for all the others.

Perhaps the American Congress will learn that grandstanding has its costs, always. Just because they aren't immediately apparent, doesn't mean they don't exist.

About Crossroads Arabia

Diana Moon on Dubai

Dubai, and a couple of other choice topics. Balance. That's why I keep checking in with Diana Moon. If you think you are getting the straight scoop on something be careful. Diana may come at it from a different angle, so prepare to get your clock cleaned. And she sucks up to nobody.

Of all the blogs I have found, hers is one of the few that makes me want to meet the writer in person. Why? Because if the occasion presented itself I think she would not pretend it was good to meet me, just because convention expected it. After a short time I expect she would make an assessment then let me know in no uncertain terms that she either enjoyed meeting me or I was full of baloney and need to get a life. And she would mean it.

Like everyone else, she is checking out Dubai. Responding to a report of a French woman who become a rape victim in a jusisdiction deriving its authority from Sharia law, she uncovered a pretty ugly scene. That part is not surprising, but she looks for some kind of meaningful reaction from those who purport to be defenders of Dubai.

After a couple of local sites that offer what is at best a tepid reaction, she comes across the US expat business types at Aquol. It's like a scene from a movie. A tawdry, dark film in black and white with a woman looking for a lost friend finds herself in a grimy local saloon with a bunch of unsavory characters who drink too much, cuss too loudly and haven't shaved for a day or two.

Sweet, eh? All that oil money, recycled back to its source. And what does the American workingman get out of this deal?

Debt, and a ticket to indentured servitude in the National Guard.

Anyway, business is business and "the Lousebury's" shrieking hysteria just shows that he's no businessman. The real eagle-eyes will just wait for the fuss to blow over and then make a killing. They always do.

I swear, I was going to predict yesterday that one of the contributors of Aqoul would post something dismissive and contemptuous of Wafa Sultan. I was not disappointed. What a pathetic little failed attempt at a louse-up.

You go, girl! I'm on your side. These guys are like cats. They will always land on their feet. Somewhere inside your heart is in the right place. And you are not for sale. Not for petro-dollars or any other kind.

Monday, March 13, 2006

It's not paranoia if they really are out to get you!

I have to give them credit for being comprehensive. Winds of Change leaves nothing out today when they look at the entire world and see an avalanche of evidence that global trends counter to the interests of good people everywhere make the need for patriotic vigilance, military might and border protection more important than breathing and eating. The death of Slobodan Milosevic was mentioned in passing, but it is too early to know if his ghost will return for the purpose of aiding the other dark forces out to destroy America.

Our goal at Winds of Change.NET is to give you one power-packed briefing of insights, news and trends from the global War on Terror that leaves you stimulated, informed, and occasionally amused every Monday & Thursday.

If you found something here you want to blog about yourself (and we hope you do), all we ask is that you do as we do and offer a Hat Tip hyperlink to today's "Winds of War".

You got it, guys. The credit is all yours. I can't think of anything a tired old unreconstructed Liberal from the past can say. In my lifetime I have been able to witness a Red Scare morph into a Cold War which seems now to have morphed into a Global War on Terror. There is an old saying that if the only tool you have is a hammer, everything you see looks like a nail.